There has been much debate with multimedia journalists whether they should use expensive video equipment ranging in the thousands of dollars or cheap point-and-shoots costing a few hundred dollars.
The past few weeks I've been experimenting using my cheap $150 Kodak Easyshare point-and- shoot to make videos for
HanfordSentinel.com. Partly because I've been too lazy to lug around my Canon GL, a very nice 3 CCD camera, with all the still photo equipment I have to carry. Also, for some reason I keep forgetting to bring tapes for the thing.
So far, I've been pleasantly surprised by my Kodak, which makes mpeg clips. Take a look at the two videos up top that I shot with the camera. The picture quality is better than I expected. And the mic picks up interviews nicely. Even though I would like to have more sound control like I do with my GL.
Yes, I would take my Canon to do more polished stories and when high quality is a factor. But when I'm expected to shoot still and video, having the point and shoot is very convenient.
Mindy McAdams had a post on her blog about using
$300 video cameras and how
Peter Read Miller's assistant,
Max Morse, had filmed a shoot in Mexico with a point and shoot camera, which is posted on
Sportshooter.com.
|